Click any moment to jump to that point in the video
A humorous and exploratory discussion on the popularity of 'incest porn' and 'stepmom porn,' linking MILF attraction to older, more powerful women. The hosts also touch on the bizarre nature of cuckold porn and mention an upcoming researcher on the topic.
The hosts discuss why Andrew Tate, given his wealth and age, should avoid fighting Jake Paul, highlighting the significant risks of permanent damage and Jake Paul's intense dedication to boxing.
Explains how some people might try to keep a partner by making them feel worse about themselves, linking it to concepts from evolutionary psychology and pickup artist tactics.
Andrew Schulz shares a surprising benefit of fame: the ability to express genuine kindness without people suspecting ulterior motives. He contrasts this with his upbringing in New York, where kindness was often a tool for manipulation, explaining why he values this aspect of his current notoriety.
The speaker shares a personal story of feeling disgusted by an ex moving on, leading to a discussion on 'juvenile possessiveness' and how it stems from insecurity about wanting to still be loved.
Andrew Schulz makes a controversial and humorous joke about the word 'uncircumcised' and 'Jewish dicks,' linking it to Kanye West's comments and the idea of Jewish control. The discussion expands to compare circumcision rates and perceptions in America versus the UK, particularly how American women view intact penises.
A deep dive into the controversies surrounding circumcision, including the argument that it reduces sensitivity and is considered 'genital mutilation' by some. The hosts humorously explore the idea that reduced sensitivity might allow men to last longer, potentially benefiting women, and share personal experiences with penis sensitivity.
A series of edgy, provocative jokes, including blaming Jews for erectile dysfunction (dubbed 'yamaka dick') and referencing Kanye West. The segment concludes with a self-aware comment about how such humor, without the context of comedy, could be perceived as a hate crime.
Andrew Schulz discusses the puzzling absence of truly hilarious R-rated comedies in recent decades. He attributes this to Hollywood executives' fear of losing their jobs, leading them to prioritize safe, unoffensive content over risky, potentially groundbreaking humor. Chris adds Rory Sutherland's quote on preferring safe failure over risky success.
Andrew Schulz discusses the two main ways men cope with frustration regarding their 'sexual destiny': going inward (self-improvement, learning social skills) or going outward (blaming women, external factors). He criticizes the manosphere's focus on 'high-value man' as a prerequisite for success, arguing that genuine charm and conversation skills are often more effective.
Andrew Schulz reflects on the transition from a relentless work ethic to prioritizing family. He discusses the tension between career ambition and becoming a husband and father, and his desire to shift from being a 'bottleneck' to building a business that creates more personal time.
Andrew Schulz explains that what often appears to be a grand, coordinated conspiracy is actually the result of individual actors making self-interested decisions, often out of fear of losing their jobs or seeking reward, which creates the appearance of coordination from the outside.
Andrew Schulz discusses the concept of a joke 'going too far,' arguing that if a joke is truly funny and the intended audience is laughing, then it's not 'too much.' He emphasizes the importance of performing jokes to the group being joked about, rather than about them behind their backs, to avoid unintentional offense.
Andrew Schulz reflects on his experience with pickup artistry, sharing how his father even sent him 'The Game.' While he found the scientific breakdown of chemistry fascinating, he criticizes the use of canned lines and, more importantly, the tactic of 'dropping a girl's confidence' to make her like you. He argues that genuine confidence doesn't need to stand on the shoulders of someone else's insecurity.
A raw anecdote about a friend's traumatic experience with non-monogamy, involving dry-wretching while his wife was with another man. The hosts then pivot to a strong opinion against normalizing 'weird s***' by giving it names like 'non-monogamy,' arguing it prevents embarrassment and self-correction.
Andrew Schulz humorously explains why men often only share negative or annoying stories about their wives with their friends, rather than positive ones. He argues that good relationship moments, while fulfilling, aren't 'fun' or entertaining to recount to male friends, who prefer to bond over shared frustrations or comedic mishaps.
Discusses how prominent pickup artists like Neil Strauss and Tucker Max eventually found the 'super transactions' of their past empty, leading them to pursue more meaningful relationships or lifestyles.
Andrew Schulz shares his controversial take that a prenup signifies an 'escape hatch' rather than a true relationship, arguing that real marriage involves fighting through challenges without a safety net.
Discusses Andrew Tate and Jordan Peterson's shared perspective that heartbreak is worse for men due to inherent possessiveness and societal views on heartbroken men.
Andrew Schulz humorously recounts a past experience where he arrogantly believed an ex-girlfriend couldn't live without him after their breakup, highlighting the narcissistic tendencies that can arise during such times.
Discussion on the potential Jake Paul vs. Andrew Tate fight, exploring its massive public appeal, the dynamic of Jake Paul as a 'heel,' and how such fights tap into tribalism between MMA and boxing fans.
Explores the immense pressure on anyone fighting Jake Paul, the potential damage to Andrew Tate's 'Top G' legacy if he loses, and the concerning health implications (neurodegeneration, speech slurring) Jake Paul is already experiencing due to his commitment to boxing.
Discusses why Nate Diaz would be the ideal next opponent for Jake Paul, emphasizing how it would ignite tribalism between MMA and boxing fans, drawing in a larger audience and creating a massive event.
Explains how content creation (podcast clips) and fight promotion (Jake Paul's matches) both thrive by tapping into larger tribal issues ('umbrella') that resonate with a broad audience. It then highlights Jake Paul's extreme commitment to boxing, even risking his lifespan, contrasting it with Andrew Tate's existing wealth and why Tate might not have the same hunger.
Continues the discussion on the Westermarck effect, exploring how humans have an affinity for people who resemble them, creating a 'dangerous situation' when separated siblings reunite. It also includes a humorous anecdote about an Indonesian adoption practice and jokingly credits Southerners for 'breaking through the Westermarck barrier.'
Discusses the Netflix documentary about a fertility doctor using his own sperm, leading to questions about the kids' intelligence. It then shifts to a study where men imagined tongue-kissing their sisters, revealing disgust in those with sisters and smiles in those without, linking it to incest aversion.
Andrew Schulz challenges common dating frustrations, arguing that many men are seeking sex, not relationships. He asserts that women are willing to sleep with men who make them feel comfortable, safe, and entertained, regardless of wealth or status, sharing a personal anecdote about getting laid while living with his parents.
Andrew Schulz contrasts the audiences drawn to self-help versus comedy, arguing that self-help attracts people 'who need the most help' and can be 'weirdest craziest followers.' He then explains why comedians should avoid claiming to be 'modern day philosophers' or 'important,' as this only gives power to those who seek to silence them through cancellation.
Andrew Schulz explains why comedians have more leeway with controversial jokes than other content creators, using the example of True Geordie's cancellation. He argues that once you're labeled a comedian, people expect outrageous humor, creating a 'protection' that serious creators don't have.
Andrew Schulz shares the best dating advice he ever received: 'just get them to the point where you can listen.' He explains that creating a comfortable space for a woman to share her thoughts and feelings builds genuine connection and separates you from others, contrasting it with superficial attempts to 'demonstrate value' like flaunting wealth.
Explains the Westermarck effect, a psychological phenomenon where individuals raised together from infancy develop a sexual aversion to each other, preventing incest even if they are not genetically related. It also discusses cases of siblings separated at birth.
Andrew Schulz discusses the 'fear of missing out' (FOMO) that many men experience if they marry young, leading some to intentionally 'close every loop' and explore all desires before settling down. He shares an anecdote about a friend who pursued pickup artistry extensively, believing his future wife should be grateful he'd satisfied all curiosities, even controversial ones, prior to commitment.
Chris Williamson shares his evolution as a podcaster, moving from a focus on ruthless information indexing to understanding his role as a 'vibe architect.' He discusses the biological impact of storytelling, citing Huberman's insight on synchronized heart rates among listeners, and how stories convey information more effectively than raw data.
Andrew Schulz gives his unique take on the manosphere, stating that it has 'always existed' but became problematic when 'not funny people' took it seriously. He argues that early manosphere ideas were often expressed through humor, tapping into relatable frustrations, but lost their nuance and became perceived as bitter and hateful when stripped of comedy.
Andrew Schulz and Chris Williamson discuss why attempts to 'cancel' Joe Rogan often fail. They argue that because Joe has shared thousands of hours of content, his audience has a comprehensive understanding of his character, making it difficult for the media to create a false narrative based on isolated clips.
Chris Williamson shares an insightful observation: visiting Miami helped him understand why much of the online men's advice portrays women as transactional and resource-focused. He explains that Miami's culture, with its emphasis on wealth and appearance, seems to be 'reverse-engineered' by some advice-givers as a universal truth about all women, which he strongly refutes based on his own vast experience.
Andrew Schulz offers a controversial perspective that the best thing for someone in a breakup is to make them hate you, arguing that 'soft landings' are selfish and more painful. He also touches on narcissism in breakups.
A discussion prompted by a tall woman's struggle to find a partner taller than her, while shorter women easily date very tall men. This leads to a controversial question about whether there should be 'height limits' for fairness in dating and the perceived double standard where women's dating preferences (like height and resources) are accepted, but men's (like younger age) are labeled as 'objectifying.' The hosts connect these preferences to biological impulses like fertility, protection, and dominance.
Andrew Schulz offers a provocative take on why women prioritizing a man's wealth when they want children is not 'gold digging,' but rather a responsible act for their kids' future. He defines true gold digging as wanting a rich partner without desiring children, emphasizing the focus on progeny's well-being.
In a segment of pure comedic satire, Andrew Schulz jokingly reveals what he 'learned' from Mr. Beast: that the YouTube star secretly runs a brothel, selling 'Beast Skin' (breaded foreskins) as calamari in his new restaurant. This absurd take showcases Schulz's unique brand of humor.
Andrew Schulz explains why Joe Rogan is a unique figure in media, highlighting his willingness to share his platform and empower others, contrasting it with how most people hoard power. He draws parallels with historical figures and other artists like Drake.
Andrew Schulz and Chris discuss Bill Burr's controversial take on the body positivity movement, suggesting it's a form of intra-sexual competition where average-looking women encourage their bigger friends not to lose weight to reduce their own competition. Schulz adds that despite public displays, no woman is truly proud to be fat.
Andrew Schulz presents a hilariously absurd and controversial theory that 'liquid sh*t ain't calories.' He argues that the calorie system is flawed, using examples like Fanta, ketchup, and melted cheese, claiming that liquids don't make you full because they're not 'real' calories.