Click any moment to jump to that point in the video
Dr. Paul Eastwick explains why showing vulnerability and being 'chosen' is more attractive than pure self-promotion, challenging the standard 'alpha' dating advice.
Dr. Eastwick explains the concept of a relationship as a unique 'microculture' of two people, making the end of a partnership even more devastating as it represents the death of a shared world.
Dr. Eastwick debunks the myth that 'mate value matching' predicts relationship success, showing that 'mismatched' couples in terms of physical attractiveness are no more likely to break up.
Chris Williamson explains that while data might not show a direct link between waiting for sex and relationship success, the *interpretation* of that behavior creates a powerful compatibility signal.
Challenging the popular narrative that the rise in female education is responsible for the increase in singledom, Eastwick argues that mismatched education levels do not actually threaten relationship stability.
Insights into 'pro-relationship biases' and how the brain naturally devalues attractive alternatives to protect an existing partnership.
Dr. Paul Eastwick challenges the foundational evolutionary psychology concept of the 'mating market,' arguing it only accurately describes interactions between strangers and fails to account for how relationships actually form over time.
Dr. Paul Eastwick explains why the 'nerd improve thyself' advice is often overemphasized and why expanding your social circle is a more effective 'blue ocean' strategy for finding a partner.
An explanation of the physiological and psychological impact of breakups, highlighting why the loss of a support structure causes such extreme physical distress.
Discussion on why constructing a 'coherent story' is the most effective way to recover from a relationship ending and close psychological open loops.
Paul Eastwick discusses his research showing that what people say they want in a partner (stated preferences) often differs significantly from who they actually choose in real-life interactions (revealed preferences).
A shocking insight into relationship science: a partner's objective attractiveness level has almost zero predictive power over long-term relationship satisfaction.
Dr. Paul Eastwick reveals a powerful psychological technique to accelerate intimacy and bonding during a first date by asking deeper questions than socially expected.
Chris Williamson discusses how 'alpha posturing' (Rolexes and Lamborghinis) fails compared to 'pro-family' content like dogs or nephews, which gains much higher engagement from women in their 30s.
An explanation of research showing that while people agree on who is attractive upon first meeting, that consensus drops to near-random levels once they actually get to know each other.
A fascinating insight into how surface-level attractiveness functions differently in short-term vs. long-term social contexts, suggesting that high initial appeal can actually diminish over time.
A humorous but scientifically grounded look at how repeated exposure in a professional setting can boost a person's perceived attractiveness rating by 'two points.'
Eastwick reveals that while people often underestimate the importance of attractiveness, perceived sexual compatibility and being a 'good lover' are the strongest predictors of relationship success.