Click any moment to jump to that point in the video
This clip exposes the disconnect between public narratives about 'sensitive men' and the anecdotal reality of women privately desiring masculine partners, questioning the authenticity of expressed preferences.
Scott Galloway exposes a societal double standard where it's widely accepted and applauded to highlight women's strengths and successes in traditionally male-dominated fields, but acknowledging or celebrating men's natural inclinations or historical strengths (e.g., in entrepreneurship or leadership) is met with uncomfortable silence or even backlash.
Scott Galloway challenges the prevalent online narrative that women face extreme physical danger when dating young men. He presents compelling data showing that young men are significantly more likely to harm themselves after a date than to harm their female partners, highlighting a serious misunderstanding of actual risks.
This clip highlights how both the political right and left misinterpret and mishandle the struggles faced by young men, with the right offering coarseness and the left blaming masculinity itself.
Scott shares a personal anecdote about parenting his son, illustrating how a father figure uniquely balances tough love with affirmation. He argues that certain forms of inspiration and 'salt and vinegar' love are most effectively delivered by older male role models to boys.
This clip explores the shifting dynamics of modern dating, noting how men are typically more interested initially and must 'demonstrate excellence' to attract women. It highlights the disappearance of traditional venues, like the workplace, where men once had opportunities to showcase their qualities, creating a challenge in finding partners.
This clip argues that the #MeToo movement's advice was disproportionately absorbed by nervous men, leading them to fear approaching women, while boundary-violators ignored it. It discusses how this reinforced male approach anxiety and the narrative of men's inherent dangerousness.
Scott Galloway shares a mentorship exercise encouraging young men to embrace rejection ('no') as a necessary step towards achieving significant successes ('yes') in life, from dating to business ventures. He explains that every great success is preceded by many rejections.
Scott Galloway uses a provocative analogy, suggesting that as society selects against 'cinnamon roll men' (those who would make great husbands with encouragement), it leaves room for 'Viking raiders' – psychopaths, sociopaths, and narcissists who disregard boundaries.
Scott Galloway offers direct dating advice for men, focusing on self-care, kindness, and having a plan. For women, he suggests the 'second coffee' rule, encouraging them to be skeptical of initial sparks and give potential partners a second chance for deeper connection, as sparks are not predictive of long-term success.
Scott Galloway introduces his concept of masculinity as an aspirational 'code' for young men, focusing on two foundational pillars: being a responsible 'provider' (economically viable, disciplined) and a 'protector' (physically capable and responsible at home).
Chris Williamson discusses Dr. Robert King's theory that the female orgasm serves as another 'selection criteria' for men, determined by sensitivity, dominance, and skill. This challenges conventional views and highlights the biased nature of the 'game' of mating, which men must accept.
Scott Galloway declares marriage the 'new luxury item,' backed by data showing a significant disparity in marriage rates between men in the highest and lowest income quintiles. He argues that the ability to select a mate has become a luxury, contrasting it with historical mating patterns.
Scott Galloway explains how the American middle class, fueled by post-WWII prosperity and policies like the GI Bill, created unprecedented mating opportunities for men beyond the top 10%. He then contrasts this with the current situation where many men are less attractive due to economic struggles and online isolation.
Scott Galloway candidly shares his personal struggles with addictions to money and external validation, explaining how being cognizant of these drives helps him modulate them. He contrasts his sober self with his slightly intoxicated self, revealing how these aspects impact his life and relationships. He also recounts stopping drinking based on AI feedback, but admits his money addiction persists. This moment offers a raw, honest look at self-awareness and the ongoing battle with personal habits.
This clip addresses why men are increasingly reluctant to approach women, attributing it to societal messaging and the ease of online alternatives. It advocates for 'adulting classes' to teach men how to express romantic interest safely and emphasizes that embracing 'nos' is essential for finding 'amazing yeses,' drawing a parallel to podcasting success.
Scott Galloway critiques how major tech companies, driven by shareholder value, profit from enraging and isolating young people. He argues this leads to a generation of 'asocial, asexual males' and the decline of traditional 'third spaces' where people used to connect.
Scott Galloway shares personal anecdotes about the profound sense of peace and masculine fulfillment he experiences when protecting his family, contrasting it with his constant striving for more in his professional life. He emphasizes the deep satisfaction derived from ensuring the safety and happiness of loved ones.
Scott Galloway discusses how online media sends conflicting messages: telling women they're queens who deserve better and should have 'one strike and you're out' policies for men, while simultaneously pushing men towards online gaming or porn, creating an unfair and confusing dating landscape.
Scott Galloway argues that online dating, lacking the ability to demonstrate deeper qualities, has reduced selection to 'base things': signaling resources (e.g., Rolex in profile) and height. He compares height for men to 'big naturals' for women, citing TikTok trends and a personal anecdote about the 'tall girl problem.'
Scott Galloway presents the stark evolutionary reality that men are 'disposable,' citing statistics on female vs. male reproduction (80% of women reproduced, only 40% of men) and the trolley problem. He explains this through an analogy of a village surviving with fewer men but not with fewer women.
This clip proposes mandatory national service, similar to Israel's model, as a comprehensive solution for young people, detailing how it fosters competence, personal skills, attractiveness, and social cohesion while reducing depression and discrimination.
Chris Williamson expresses profound frustration with the constant societal pressure to preface discussions about men's struggles (like mental health or suicide) with extensive acknowledgements of women's historical challenges, likening it to a 'land acknowledgement' that is both irritating and exhausting.
Scott Galloway argues that young men should embrace their horniness and channel it productively, using the analogy of fire. He advises using this desire to become a better person, develop kindness, improve appearance, have a plan, and most importantly, learn to listen and ask questions on dates instead of just boasting. This moment offers practical dating advice rooted in personal growth.
Scott Galloway introduces Richard Reeves' concept of "surplus value" as the true measure of a man, defining it as the point at which an individual adds more value to society and others than they extract. He uses examples of "negative value" and explains how this goes beyond age or religious ceremony, encouraging men to strive for a life where they contribute economically, emotionally, and socially more than they consume.
Chris Williamson introduces the concept of the 'soft bigotry of male expectations,' arguing that society applauds women for excelling in traditionally masculine roles but implicitly devalues or neglects to celebrate traditionally feminine strengths like nurturing, caring, or home-building, suggesting a subtle form of sexism against women's unique contributions.
Scott Galloway critiques modern progressive efforts in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) and affirmative action, arguing they've gone 'too far' and shifted focus from class diversity to racial diversity. He highlights how this often benefits upper-income individuals within minority groups, failing to address the fundamental problem of economic mobility for the truly disadvantaged, and suggests affirmative action should be 'based on color, but that color is green.'
Scott Galloway observes that the Democratic National Convention and party platforms extensively address the struggles of numerous special interest groups (women, non-whites, LGBTQ+, immigrants) but conspicuously omit young men, despite this group falling 'further faster relative to any other group' on various metrics. This highlights a significant blind spot in progressive political discourse.
Scott Galloway argues that men are being 'gaslit' by societal messages that claim women don't need a man while simultaneously selecting for traditionally masculine traits like providing. He advocates for honesty, urging women to 'call out the game' and admit they desire masculine men, rather than creating confusing expectations.
This clip delves into the complex psychological needs of men, highlighting their desire to strive for greatness without feeling insufficient, seeking recognition for suffering without being patronized, and needing a blend of self-belief and understanding support. It culminates in the 'ultimate message' every man wants to hear.
Scott Galloway differentiates between being "nice" and being "kind," explaining that while niceness often comes with an expectation of reciprocity, true kindness is authentic and given without strings attached. He highlights that women find a man's ability to signal resources, intellect, and especially genuine kindness, as the most attractive qualities.
This clip presents compelling research showing the severe consequences for boys who lack male role models, including higher incarceration rates and suicide risk. It argues for a societal shift to recognize boys' emotional and neurological fragility and the community's responsibility to provide male mentorship.
Scott Galloway advises men to cultivate kindness as a daily practice, sharing how he actively compliments strangers and engages in thoughtful acts without expecting anything in return. He explains that women instinctively seek kind partners, especially due to the vulnerability of gestation, and that while the "bad boy" effect might work short-term, genuine kindness is what leads to lasting attraction and partnership according to research.
Chris Williamson proposes a humorous, manipulative live experiment to expose the difference between women's stated and revealed preferences in dating, particularly regarding a man's income, education, and height, highlighting how real-world choices often contradict declared ideals.
Drawing from his experience giving best man toasts, Scott Galloway shares three critical pieces of advice for men in long-term relationships: always express affection and sexual interest (e.g., holding hands, buying jewelry), put away the "scorecard" and prioritize being the partner you want to be rather than tallying contributions, and never let your partner be cold or hungry, as these simple stressors can lead to significant conflict.