Steven Crowder discusses the case of Pastor Stephen Weston, who was jailed or fined for refusing to marry gay couples, illustrating a 'slippery slope' where initial support for such actions against a 'religious nut bag' eventually impacts broader free speech, even for comedians.
Click any moment to jump to that point in the video
The hosts recount a YouTube meeting in New York where conservatives were flown out to discuss demonetization and content guidelines. They describe how YouTube representatives gave only boilerplate answers, avoiding direct questions and failing to provide clear guidelines, highlighting a lack of transparency.
The hosts argue that content creators cannot maintain authenticity while adhering to YouTube's increasingly restrictive and ambiguous rules, especially if they don't fully agree with YouTube's underlying ideology. This creates a dilemma where creators must compromise their true selves or face censorship.
The hosts discuss a common behavior observed in left-wing discourse: ignoring or going along with obviously ridiculous ideas to avoid criticizing their own 'team.' This reluctance to challenge internal absurdities, even when illogical, is seen as a way to maintain unity and avoid self-inflicted attacks.
The hosts discuss their observations that online interest for leftist activist events (like Antifa or Fight for 15) rarely translates to actual physical attendance, with real turnout being significantly lower than online RSVPs, suggesting a flaw in online activism metrics.
The hosts discuss Mark Ruffalo's left-leaning politics and past association with conspiracy theories. They clarify a key fact: Ruffalo did have a brain tumor, which is a known medical condition, not a conspiracy.
Steven Crowder shares his controversial perspective on the AIDS epidemic, asserting it was a 'hoax' for those not engaging in specific high-risk behaviors like heroin use or unprotected sex, and discusses the intense backlash he received for these statements, despite the statistics.
The hosts discuss the perceived 'Superman curse,' noting Dean Cain as an exception among actors who played the role. This leads to a broader sentiment of fatigue with superhero films, especially with multiple reboots of characters like Spider-Man.
The hosts share an incident where YouTube forced them to blur a person's face in a video, despite the footage being legally obtained in a single-party consent state at a public protest with a signed release. This demonstrates YouTube's arbitrary enforcement of rules over actual law.
The hosts discuss YouTube's 'blunt tools' for content moderation and the prevalence of disturbing, violent, or sexually suggestive 'creepy cartoons' disguised as children's content. They highlight the paradox of YouTube's advanced technology failing to filter harmful content while simultaneously restricting other forms of expression.
The hosts discuss a controversial claim that Bruce Lee's influential book, 'The Tao of Jeet Kune Do,' contained plagiarized passages. They clarify it as a 'collection of martial arts technique' rather than intentional deception, acknowledging its role in shifting martial arts philosophy.
The discussion highlights the double-edged sword of new media: while it allows broader information sharing, it also enables anyone to spread lies. The hosts express concern over Silicon Valley's role in determining 'truth' and how this fuels skepticism and conspiracy theories.
Joe Rogan discusses the radical evolution of martial arts techniques from 1970 to 2018, emphasizing Bruce Lee's crucial role in introducing an open-minded approach that encouraged taking useful elements from different styles like boxing and wrestling. He also touches on how Bruce Lee's physical capabilities, while influential, would be challenged by modern UFC fighters.
The hosts recount their conflict with the Bob Ross estate after creating a parody video. They highlight YouTube's inconsistent strike system and their humorous, defiant response to legal threats, illustrating the challenges content creators face with platform moderation.
The hosts discuss how YouTube issued a Community Guidelines strike to a user for simply listening to and recommending an intellectual conversation between Sam Harris and Douglas Murray about immigration, identity, and Islam. This highlights YouTube's broad and seemingly arbitrary application of 'hate speech' rules, even to nuanced discussions.
The hosts mock YouTube's claim of being the 'most technologically advanced company in the world' while their own channels receive irrelevant ads for 'Muslim singles and gay cruises,' highlighting the irony of their algorithm's failure to target ads effectively, especially when they demonetize content for not being 'advertiser friendly.'
The hosts explain the success of their 'Change My Mind' segment, where they engage in unedited, hour-long discussions with people holding opposing views on controversial topics. They highlight how this format works better than traditional cable news and resonates with audiences seeking authentic dialogue.
The hosts cite Dr. Q. Van Meter, a pediatric endocrinologist, who states there is 'zero point zero evidence' that the concepts of gender fluidity and gender identity have any scientific basis. This clip presents a controversial scientific perspective challenging prevailing narratives on gender.
The hosts emphasize the importance of engaging in conversations and debates with people, even when there's significant disagreement, rather than being offended by the discussion itself. They advocate for exchanging ideas as 'fuel for thought,' fostering understanding and challenging perspectives.
Steven Crowder discusses the case of Pastor Stephen Weston, who was jailed or fined for refusing to marry gay couples, illustrating a 'slippery slope' where initial support for such actions against a 'religious nut bag' eventually impacts broader free speech, even for comedians.
The hosts discuss the controversial case of Fallon Fox, a transgender MMA fighter, questioning the fairness and ethics of a biological male competing against biological women, and the resistance to acknowledging biological differences in such contexts.
Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder discuss Dr. Peter Duesberg's highly controversial theory that HIV is a weak virus and AIDS, particularly in certain communities, is primarily caused by immune system compromise from heavy drug use like amyl nitrate and crystal meth, not HIV itself. They touch on his ostracization from the medical community and the social pushback against his ideas.
Steven Crowder and Joe Rogan highlight the extreme and often absurd nature of modern political rhetoric, specifically calling out the irrationality of labeling Ben Shapiro, a Jewish man, as a Nazi or white supremacist. They argue such accusations diminish credibility and escalate dangerous language.
The hosts discuss a cultural phenomenon where the political climate, intensified by Donald Trump's presidency, has led to an internal struggle within progressive circles. They observe that the constant pressure to be 'left-wing enough' results in progressives attacking and 'eating their own' for not meeting increasingly extreme ideological standards.
The hosts highlight the internal contradictions within progressive movements by discussing the 'pussyhat' controversy. They find it absurd that the symbol of the Women's March became offensive to trans women and women of color, showcasing how the drive to be 'progressive enough' leads to in-fighting and perceived ridiculousness.
The hosts discuss the perceived decline in activity of recent protest movements, particularly the Women's March, raising the controversial question of whether some participants were paid to show up and if that indicates a lack of genuine grassroots support.
A former CIA member reveals to Joe Rogan that lawyers, not military personnel, ultimately make the final decisions on drone strikes, meticulously weighing factors like collateral damage and the presence of 'friendlies' in a building.
The hosts delve into the various conspiracy theories surrounding the Las Vegas shooting, discussing differing timelines, a second person of interest, and explaining how chaos during such an event can lead to widespread misinformation and false reports of multiple shooters.
An explanation of how modern genetic testing can identify individual predispositions to diseases and predict negative interactions with various medications, significantly increasing the efficacy of treatments and reducing adverse effects.
The hosts discuss the unsettling family history of the Las Vegas shooter, revealing that his father was a serial bank robber and his brother was arrested for child pornography, adding a dark context to the shooter's background.
The hosts explore the psychological motivations behind people's attraction to conspiracy theories, suggesting it appeals to a fundamental human desire to uncover secrets, a contrarian mindset, and the satisfaction derived from feeling 'right' against the mainstream.
Joe Rogan recounts his personal evolution in martial arts, from Taekwondo to Muay Thai and Jujitsu, emphasizing the necessity of an open-minded approach to learning diverse techniques and adapting training when confronted with superior skills or unexpected challenges.
The hosts delve into the nuances of 9/11 conspiracy theories, differentiating between the extreme claim that the government orchestrated the attacks and the more plausible argument that they took advantage of the tragedy to push through policies like the Patriot Act.
A user received a Community Guidelines strike for simply listening to an intellectual conversation between Sam Harris and Douglas Murray about left-wing culture and ideology. The hosts express disbelief that such a discussion could be flagged as 'hate speech,' highlighting YouTube's extreme content moderation.
The hosts discuss how Douglas Murray's critical analysis of open border policies and real issues in Europe, discussed with Sam Harris, was labeled as 'hate speech' by YouTube. This highlights YouTube's problematic moderation of nuanced political topics.
An early conservative YouTuber's historical video about Japanese atrocities during World War II, specifically the Rape of Nanking, was removed by YouTube as 'hate speech.' The hosts discuss the irony and how YouTube eventually apologized after direct contact, raising concerns for creators without such connections.
YouTube claims their demonetization tools are 'blunt' but improving, yet the hosts highlight the persistent problem of horrific, violent, or sexually suggestive cartoons (e.g., Minnie Mouse getting raped, babies hit with bottles) on kids' playlists, exposing a critical failure in content moderation for children.
The hosts mock YouTube's claim of being the 'most technologically advanced company in the world' while their conservative channels receive irrelevant ads for 'Muslim singles and gay cruises.' They highlight the hypocrisy, questioning why YouTube can't match ads to content or audience, especially when demonetizing conservative videos.
The hosts criticize Ana from The Young Turks for body-shaming Alex Jones, calling him a 'fat [__],' highlighting the hypocrisy of a progressive platform using such tactics. They also point out the irony that Cenk Uygur, Ana's colleague, is heavier than Alex Jones.
The hosts discuss the success of their 'Change My Mind' segment, which features unedited, long-form discussions on controversial topics like gun rights or abortion. They argue that the left fails to engage in similar discourse due to their antiquated, segment-driven media formats, which prevent genuine, in-depth conversations.
A bizarre and controversial clip from a transgender town hall features a speaker explaining that a male's penis must be sufficiently developed for enough tissue to be inverted to create a 'fake vagina.' The hosts also highlight the offensive use of 'transition the other way' and the assumption that all transgender individuals seek surgery.
Steven Crowder discusses the case of a Canadian pastor fined for refusing to officiate a same-sex marriage, arguing it's an early example of a slippery slope where free speech and religious freedom are eroded, leading to broader implications for comedians and individuals expressing dissenting views.
Steven Crowder recounts a controversial past segment where they discussed the "AIDS epidemic was always a hoax" for specific populations and the backlash received. He then dives into the debate around AIDS disclosure laws, arguing against the idea that such laws "stigmatize people" and questioning at what point society is allowed to stigmatize certain behaviors.
Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder discuss Dr. Peter Duesberg, a UC Berkeley professor ostracized for his controversial theory that HIV is a weak virus and AIDS is primarily caused by compromised immune systems due to heavy party drug use (amyl nitrate, crystal meth), rather than HIV itself. They highlight how this was treated as a social issue, not a scientific debate.
The hosts discuss the challenges of engaging in debates, emphasizing the importance of identifying whether someone's resistance stems from deeply ingrained ideology or genuine logical counter-arguments. They advise on making examples of those unwilling to listen to sway convincible audiences and focusing on factual refutation.
Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder discuss a humorous and controversial tweet from Donald Trump, where he sarcastically 'supported' the Women's March by telling participants to go out and celebrate the economic success that had taken place under his administration.
Joe Rogan discusses the benefits of genetic testing, explaining how it can reveal predispositions to diseases and, more importantly, identify medications with which an individual might have negative interactions. He shares his own experience of finding certain painkillers and antidepressants that would not work effectively or could cause adverse reactions, highlighting how this can increase medication efficacy by up to 50%.
Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder discuss the dual nature of new media. While it allows for authentic content and bypasses traditional time constraints, it also enables anyone to spread information, including proactive lies. They warn against relying on Silicon Valley companies to be the arbiters of truth.
Steven Crowder details how their brilliant researcher, 'Reg,' uncovered the online grooming activities of a self-proclaimed pedophile featured in a Salon.com article titled 'I'm a pedophile, but I'm not a monster.' Crowder explains how Salon's defense of the pedophile led their team to expose his active predatory behavior.
The hosts expose YouTube's double standards in content moderation, contrasting the demonetization of conservative content with the allowance of a BuzzFeed video featuring period blood painting in the trending feed. They describe a meeting where YouTube representatives failed to explain their guidelines clearly.
A critical take on the 'wild progressive left' as a monolithic entity that avoids open discussion on controversial topics, particularly the 'highly controversial issue of puberty blockers.' The hosts argue that the left cannot have this conversation because they refuse to 'draw the line' on how far to 'play along with delusion,' citing examples of media and tech companies avoiding the topic.
Steven Crowder and Joe Rogan discuss the alarming incident where Ben Shapiro was physically threatened on the Dr. Drew show for misgendering someone, highlighting the extreme reactions and perceived justification of violence for 'wrong words,' and connecting it to the broader issue of identity politics.
The hosts discuss Ruby Rose's personal story of wanting to transition as a child but being grateful she didn't, using her experience to advocate for individuals to reach adulthood before making irreversible, life-changing decisions regarding gender, and briefly touching on the controversial topic of hormone blockers.
Jared recounts his harrowing experience going undercover with Antifa, initially perceiving them as a 'sad social club,' only to quickly realize the danger when they started passing around weapons and discussing violence. He describes his desperate and comical escape by faking a need to 'take a dump.'
The hosts express outrage over how local police and news outlets ignored clear video evidence of Antifa members distributing sharp objects and advocating violence. They suggest the inaction was due to the information not fitting a predetermined narrative or political agenda, highlighting a perceived failure of journalism and law enforcement.
This clip directly challenges the claim that hormone blockers can be 'turned off' and allow for normal puberty, with the speaker vehemently stating it's 'crazy' and 'absolutely not true' based on basic biological understanding, highlighting a point of contention in gender transition discussions.
The hosts debate the claims made at a transgender town hall that puberty blockers are reversible and have no lasting impact on children. They vehemently disagree, arguing that such interventions at a young age irrevocably alter a child's development and that children are too young to make such life-altering decisions.
This clip explains why most actors in Hollywood lean left-wing and avoid political controversy: the 'illusion' that they need to be 'castable' and conform to the 'Hollywood dogma.' The hosts use Tim Allen's experience of being 'canceled' for his right-wing views as a prime example of the industry's intolerance for dissenting opinions.
The hosts recount going undercover as a gay couple to a town hall advocating for transitioning children as young as three years old with puberty blockers. They express shock and disbelief at the arguments presented, including the claim that puberty blockers are reversible, highlighting the extreme views on child gender transitions.
Joe Rogan and guests find humor in a tweet from Donald Trump that simultaneously supports the Women's March and boasts about his administration's economic success, labeling it as 'strong trolling' and appreciating its comedic value.
Joe Rogan shares a humorous story about Alex Jones's 'aggressively hospitable' nature, including a persistent voicemail and the hosts having to 'escape' Austin while undercover, ultimately expressing a fondness for Jones's entertaining and 'crazy' personality.
The hosts highlight a recurring and often ignored factor in mass shootings: the perpetrators' use of psychiatric medication. They argue this connection should be a central point of discussion and concern.
A story about an undercover operation where the host's wife posed as a lesbian to inquire about getting breast augmentation covered by Medicare/Medicaid by claiming to 'identify as someone with bigger breasts', highlighting the absurdity and financial implications of certain gender identity claims.
A humorous take on the extreme leaps of logic by a Flat Earth proponent who also believes dinosaurs aren't real, nuclear bombs are fake, satellites are fake, and dismisses effective martial arts like Jujitsu while endorsing Wing Chun.
The hosts discuss Bruce Lee's significant theoretical contributions to mixed martial arts but controversially assert that, despite his importance, he would likely be defeated by a 'decent flyweight in the UFC' due to the radical evolution of martial arts techniques since his era.
The speaker confronts YouTube representatives about their double standards, questioning why a BuzzFeed video of women painting with period blood was allowed on the trending feed, while conservative content is often flagged for being 'offensive' or 'hate speech' and demonetized.
The hosts recount creating a highly controversial parody video of Bob Ross painting Mohammed with period blood, leading to a cease and desist from the Bob Ross estate and YouTube strikes. They describe their humorous legal response, highlighting the absurdity of the situation.
At a YouTube meeting, a representative from a 'Next Gen News' hip-hop channel, whose sizzle reel was filled with the N-word and profanity, claimed her content was unaffected by demonetization. This starkly contrasted with the experiences of conservative creators, exposing YouTube's selective enforcement and bias.
The hosts express frustration at the extreme rhetoric prevalent in political discourse, specifically the absurdity of calling Ben Shapiro, a Jewish man, a Nazi or white supremacist. They compare it to Jordan Peterson being equated to Hitler and highlight the irony that Shapiro was the number one recipient of anti-Semitic hate online in 2016, questioning the credibility of a movement that employs such baseless accusations.
The hosts discuss instances where individuals face severe backlash for expressing views on gender identity, from Mike Ward the comedian to Ben Shapiro being threatened for misgendering, and the controversial topic of trans athletes like Fallon Fox. They question where society draws the line on acceptable speech and biological reality.
Steven Crowder discusses the internal conflict within progressive movements, exemplified by the "Pussyhat" controversy, where the symbol of the Women's March was deemed offensive to trans women and women of color. He highlights the absurdity of the situation and critiques the inability of some on the left to engage in self-criticism or humor without attacking their own team.
Steven Crowder and Joe Rogan discuss the intricate details of their undercover operation infiltrating Antifa. They describe how their researcher 'Reg' gained access to cryptic messaging apps used by the group and how their gathered information was later shared with the FBI, leading to arrests.
The speaker contends that Silicon Valley's radical left, progressive, neo-Marxist ideology permeates tech companies like YouTube, leading to arbitrary and biased content moderation decisions that fail to apply rules honestly or equally. This creates an authoritarian approach to content.
Steven Crowder argues that many large-scale protests, like the Women's March and 'Fight for 15', are not genuine grassroots movements but are instead funded or mandated by leftist organizations, unions, and nonprofits, with participants often paid or required to attend as part of their job descriptions. Joe Rogan offers a counterpoint, suggesting many people are genuinely passionate.
The hosts recount a YouTube meeting where a 'Next Gen News' presenter, a white woman, showed a sizzle reel filled with the N-word and profanity, yet stated her channel was unaffected by the 'adpocalypse.' This highlights YouTube's inconsistent application of content guidelines and perceived ideological bias.
Steven Crowder and NotGay Jared recount their detailed undercover operation to infiltrate an Antifa group, including Jared's disguise, using cryptic messaging apps, and identifying members through roll calls. They reveal that the FBI later approached them for information, confirming their intelligence was valuable for tracking arrests.
The hosts expose Salon.com's controversial article titled 'I'm a Pedophile But I'm Not a Monster,' which advocated for empathy towards pedophiles. They describe how their researcher, Reg, uncovered the author's online grooming activities, and Salon's subsequent defense of the pedophile, illustrating a concerning trend in media and political correctness.
The hosts recount an undercover investigation where they posed as a gay couple at a transgender town hall. They were disturbed to find advocates promoting the use of puberty blockers for children as young as three years old, calling the idea 'insane' and 'nuts' due to the profound ethical implications.
Playing a clip from a transgender town hall, the hosts vehemently argue against the claim that puberty blockers for young children are reversible. They emphasize the irreversible changes to body development and the absurdity of allowing children to make such life-altering decisions, questioning the 'research' supporting it.
Steven Crowder recounts the alarming experience of being handed sharp objects by Antifa members who were openly advocating violence during his undercover operation. He highlights the subsequent media blackout, with local news outlets refusing to cover the confirmed events and a university official, later revealed to be a Clinton staffer, issuing a statement claiming "nothing happened."
The hosts cite Dr. Q Van Meter, a pediatric endocrinologist specializing in gender dysphoria, who states there is 'zero point zero evidence' that the concepts of gender fluidity and gender identity have any scientific basis. This challenges prevailing narratives and offers a controversial medical perspective.
Discussing Ruby Rose's past desire to transition and her current happiness that she didn't, advocating for individuals to reach adulthood before making 'inalterable life-changing decisions' regarding gender transition. The clip also directly refutes the claim that hormone blockers can be simply 'turned off' without lasting effects.
The hosts discuss a shocking case in Canada where a woman faced a human rights violation case, potentially leading to jail, for refusing to use preferred gender pronouns and displaying a sign stating 'a transgender woman is a man.' This clip highlights the extreme implications of pronoun laws and the conflict between biological reality and gender identity ideology.
The hosts discuss 'Benjamin's take' on millennial parents turning their children into 'social experiments,' specifically an instance of a Hollywood figure discussing transitioning his three-year-old, which Benjamin vehemently condemned as monstrous, highlighting extreme views on early childhood gender identity.
The hosts discuss the dangerous consequence of overusing terms like 'Nazi' to describe those with reasonable views. They argue that when true Nazis (like those seen at Charlottesville) appear, the term loses its meaning, pushing people further right as they disassociate from the false labels and potentially embrace actual extremist ideologies.
The hosts criticize the 'wild progressive left' for their inability to engage in open discussion, particularly on highly controversial issues like puberty blockers, arguing that they refuse to 'draw the line' and challenge what is perceived as delusion in gender identity discourse.
This clip vividly describes the viral 'Trigglypuff' incident at Amherst, where a woman aggressively protested the speakers. The hosts recall their shock and amusement, perceiving her as an unbelievable caricature of an SJW, highlighting the surreal nature of extreme college protests.
A discussion on the state of free speech in Canada, highlighting a case where a woman faced a human rights violation complaint and potential arrest for a sign stating 'a transgender woman is a man.' The hosts argue that forcing ideological compliance through 'hate speech' laws, rather than engaging in conversation and proving someone wrong, is a dangerous precedent.
This moment describes an undercover operation where the host's wife posed as a lesbian to inquire about breast augmentation being covered by Medicare/Medicaid under the guise of 'gender dysphoria,' highlighting the perceived absurdity and hypocrisy of using a medical condition for cosmetic procedures while calling the underlying biological reality 'hate speech.'
The speaker uses a shocking, recent case of a child molester who claimed to 'identify as a six-year-old boy' to illustrate the perceived absurdity and dangers of extending identity politics to extreme lengths, arguing that society is entering a 'la-la land' where common sense is abandoned in discussions about gender.
This clip delves into Milo Yiannopoulos's controversial claim that age-gap relationships (15-17 year-old boys with older men) are 'far more acceptable' in the gay community than in the straight community, contrasting societal reactions and highlighting perceived double standards.
This clip expresses deep concern and frustration over adults making gender-altering decisions for young children, referencing a personal anecdote where a friend's ex-wife 'turned his child into a girl' through active pushing, emphasizing the pliability of children at that age.
A shocking discussion about a recent case where a man busted for molesting children claimed to 'identify as a six-year-old boy,' leading to a broader commentary on how people exploit identity claims and the denial of reality surrounding certain gender issues.
This clip addresses Donald Trump's controversial 'shithole country' comment about Haiti. The hosts argue that regardless of who said it, Haiti is objectively a 'shitty place' due to its government's failures, and that criticizing a black-led government for screwing its own black citizenry shouldn't be automatically labeled racist, highlighting the complexities of political correctness.
The hosts recount disturbing details about Bryan Singer's parties, specifically 'photos of his party' showing 'a pool filled with boys' with 'red lights,' and express outrage that such behavior was 'fully accepted' and not hidden, leading to 'fake outrage' from critics.
A comical anecdote about Alex Jones's divorce hearing where he claimed to smoke marijuana once a year to test if George Soros was making it stronger, and his inability to recall his children's teachers' names due to having 'a big bowl of chili.'
This clip revisits Milo Yiannopoulos's highly controversial statements about young gay boys having 'positive relationships with an older man who acts as a mentor,' and his personal confession on a podcast that he was molested as a youth but considered himself a 'predator' at 14, causing significant discomfort.