Click any moment to jump to that point in the video
The speaker discusses how even before significant socialization, kindergarten-aged boys and girls exhibit distinct play patterns. Boys tend to engage in more violent, war-like games, while girls gravitate towards nurturing and care-giving roles. This suggests an innate, biological component to these gendered preferences, which aligns with the broader discussion of morbid curiosity and preparing for potential threats.
The speaker discusses the growing interest in police body cam footage, available through FOIA requests, and the channels dedicated to narrating these events. The primary appeal is identified as the opportunity to learn how to navigate potentially dangerous interactions with law enforcement. Viewers analyze ambiguous situations to understand police perspectives, identify actions that might escalate a situation, and consider how they would react, using the footage as a learning tool for self-preservation.
This segment explores the surprising finding that disgust sensitivity isn't as strongly correlated with morbid curiosity as one might expect. It introduces the idea that our minds distinguish between infectious and non-infectious bodily injuries, which influences our level of disgust and curiosity.
This clip delves into the fourth domain of morbid curiosity: the supernatural and paranormal. It explains how an interest in things that aren't 'real' can help us understand other minds, reduce uncertainty about threats, and historically, make sense of unknown dangers like disease.
This moment explains the adaptive reason why prey animals like gazelles sometimes observe predators instead of fleeing, highlighting the evolutionary need to learn about threats without depleting crucial caloric resources.
Colton Scrivner breaks down why zombie movies are uniquely captivating. He explains how they reliably tap into all four domains of morbid curiosity: the minds of dangerous people, violence, uncertain danger (supernatural), and body violations, making them broadly appealing and often high-grossing.
Chris Williamson introduces a fascinating filmmaking trope called "Monster Enters Left." He explains how horror directors exploit the human eye's tendency to drift right by placing jump scares and surprises on the left side of the screen, where viewer attention is weakest, to maximize impact.
This clip outlines the first three of four domains of morbid curiosity: witnessing violence, interest in violent people (true crime), and the outcome of violence (bodily injuries), explaining the underlying reasons for our fascination with each.
This moment explores the observed gender differences in preferences for morbid content, noting that true crime podcasts lean female and war stories lean male. The speaker proposes a theory that people are drawn to content reflecting the types of violence they are historically most likely to encounter: women facing violence from men in personal relationships, and men facing violence from other men in conflict or war scenarios.
The speaker recounts an experience running a summer camp where he introduced the game "Mafia" to young children (5-9 years old). Despite his efforts to keep the narration tame, the children, especially the boys, quickly took over storytelling, creating shockingly graphic and violent descriptions of murders and demanding justice through "hanging." This anecdote powerfully illustrates children's innate morbid curiosity and desire to engage with dark themes, even without external provocation.
Behavioral scientist Colton Scrivner reveals his research-backed definition of the horror genre, focusing on the dynamic between a vulnerable protagonist and a formidable antagonist. He debunks common, less accurate definitions (like audience fear or writer's intent) and explains how this core dynamic appeals to morbid curiosity.
Chris Williamson delves into the neuroscience behind the "Monster Enters Left" horror trope. He explains "pseudo neglect" and how sudden movements on the left side of the screen tap into the right hemisphere, which is more reactive to emotion and novelty, creating a "one-two punch" effect that heightens surprise and impact.
Chris Williamson and Colton Scrivner discuss whether increased exposure to horrific images at a young age is desensitizing people or increasing morbid curiosity. Colton explains the challenges of conducting longitudinal developmental studies in a rapidly changing technological landscape, and reflects on the paradox of living in a historically less violent era while having unprecedented access to online violence.
This clip summarizes a research study on individual differences in morbid curiosity, revealing that it's a distinct trait only about 50% explainable by other personality factors. It highlights key predictors like psychopathy (rebelliousness subscale), gender differences (men prefer violence, women prefer minds of dangerous people), and age (younger people being more curious).
This moment details Tom Cuper's fascinating study where people were asked to touch fake wound dressings. The results showed a clear preference for touching bandages from non-infectious injuries (like a knife wound) over infectious ones (like an eye infection), illustrating how our minds differentiate between types of danger and disgust.
The speaker shares a personal story of how the COVID-19 pandemic forced them to pivot their research. They conducted a study revealing that people with higher morbid curiosity experienced greater psychological resilience, optimism, and lower anxiety/depression during the early months of the pandemic, even after controlling for other factors like income and personality. This offers a surprising insight into the potential benefits of morbid curiosity.
This moment presents an empirically backed theory that dreaming exists as an evolutionary mechanism to rehearse threats in an "offline" state, allowing for valuable learning without expending energy or resources needed for waking activities.
This clip explains the core evolutionary reason behind morbid curiosity: humans can gain learning benefits about potential threats through stories and media without experiencing real danger, akin to 'candy for our minds.'
The speaker addresses the common phenomenon of women being attracted to or sending fan mail to notorious serial killers like Ted Bundy and Dahmer. They explain that this can be a safe way for morbidly curious individuals to learn about dangerous people when the threat is contained (e.g., in prison). Research is cited showing that women high in morbid curiosity are interested in men with dark personality traits (psychopathy, sadism, Machiavellianism) primarily for learning and understanding, rather than romantic warmth.
This clip explains the 'threat learning' mechanism behind morbid curiosity. Evolution has instilled a 'push and pull' between avoiding danger and approaching it to learn, especially in safe situations, making us better prepared for future threats. The UFC ringside analogy perfectly illustrates this.
Behavioral scientist Colton Scrivner challenges the common misconception that people who enjoy horror films have low empathy. He reveals his research findings showing no correlation between empathy levels and horror viewership, explaining that empathy for the protagonist is actually crucial for enjoying the genre. He also discusses a study where people *perceived* horror fans as less empathetic, highlighting a societal bias.